https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:42664 Wed 31 Aug 2022 13:58:15 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:43706 Wed 28 Sep 2022 10:16:06 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:45059 p = 0.02) to substantial (graduated tuning fork, К: 0.68, CI: 0.41–0.95, p < 0.01). The 10-site monofilament (К: 0.44–0.77) outperformed the 4-site test (К: 0.34–0.67) and the dampened tuning fork method (К: 0.41–0.49) showed lower intra-rater reliability compared to both conventional (К: 0.52–0.57) and graduated methods (К: 0.50–0.57). Conclusion: We support the current recommendations of using more than one test to screen and monitor progression of DPN. Four- and 10-site 10 g monofilament testing have similarly acceptable levels of reliability and the neurothesiometer is the most reliable method of assessing vibration perception function. Use of a graduated tuning fork was slightly more reliable than other methods of tuning fork application however all had substantial reliability. Years of clinical experience only marginally affected test reliability overall and due to subjective nature of the tests we suggest that testing should be performed regularly and repetitively.]]> Wed 26 Oct 2022 12:09:42 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:37460 Thu 17 Dec 2020 10:47:53 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:27521 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:28:55 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:44525 Fri 14 Oct 2022 13:58:33 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:41807 Fri 12 Aug 2022 12:31:40 AEST ]]>